Thanks for the update. Of course they don't have any, lol.the engine air filter in now on K&N, but its sold out, its the 33-5107 filter
Thanks for the update. Of course they don't have any, lol.the engine air filter in now on K&N, but its sold out, its the 33-5107 filter
I did the same about a week ago, lol.FYI the filter is on Amazon and shows a shipping July 27 - Aug 18. I have already ordered it so whenever its stocked then it will ship.
yep, me too. i just havent really been on my computer to update anything. I also noticed that ebay has several no name cold air intakes, i was almost thinking about buying one of those and replace the cone on it with a K&N. I still have a few weeks to decide.I did the same about a weekago, lol.
I would love to see a comparison.K&N 33-5107 air flow test. I wonder if GM advertises the same info for the stock paper filter?
Me too. I did a whole write up on it in the parts/accessories section. Let us know what you think about it. Ive already noticed better throttle response and passing power on the freeway.OK, got the K&N Engine Air Filter, got it in, and good to go, here a few pics...
I am curious, are you still running this set up? I am thinking about jumping in and doing this.View attachment 788
So got some news guys and gals (granted this was an experimental version but...
1. It does work (ran about 50 miles after install)
2. Actually decently cheap (about 40-50$ for this experimental version)
3. The maf housing was for (get ready to laugh) a honda civic (M8B7 70 mm)
4.Yes it does give the tubo fluttler sounds
5.About the same fuel economy (i was heavier on the pedal because yanno turbo flutter and only seen a difference of about 0.1 mpg over 50 miles)
6. Yes that is the stock airvox base as you would either have to:
A. Have a hanger or bracket to hold the intake and housing up
Or
B. Just lay the intake inside of the airbox as i did which actually doesn't move around a whole lot if at all (i checked every so often about 5 times during the trip)
50 mile test range was city and open roads as well so it was a mix of both with no issues.
I'll keep everyone updated but for now this does work
I have made a similar mod, I deleted the stupid baffle box after the turbo and made my own intake piping then cut a spot for the maf. Sounds cool, but noticed a hp increase but loss of torque. I decided to go back to my original idea of using stock airbox. Best i can recommend is k&n filter for stock air box and deleting the snorkel on the stock box will get very similar results. I measured maf through ob2 live data coming from the ecm and it really can mess up things if not done properly.View attachment 788
So got some news guys and gals (granted this was an experimental version but...
1. It does work (ran about 50 miles after install)
2. Actually decently cheap (about 40-50$ for this experimental version)
3. The maf housing was for (get ready to laugh) a honda civic (M8B7 70 mm)
4.Yes it does give the tubo fluttler sounds
5.About the same fuel economy (i was heavier on the pedal because yanno turbo flutter and only seen a difference of about 0.1 mpg over 50 miles)
6. Yes that is the stock airvox base as you would either have to:
A. Have a hanger or bracket to hold the intake and housing up
Or
B. Just lay the intake inside of the airbox as i did which actually doesn't move around a whole lot if at all (i checked every so often about 5 times during the trip)
50 mile test range was city and open roads as well so it was a mix of both with no issues.
I'll keep everyone updated but for now this does work
I have made a similar mod, I deleted the stupid baffle box after the turbo and made my own intake piping then cut a spot for the maf. Sounds cool, but noticed a hp increase but loss of torque. I decided to go back to my original idea of using stock airbox. Best i can recommend is k&n filter for stock air box and deleting the snorkel on the stock box will get very similar results. I measured maf through ob2 live data coming from the ecm and it really can mess up things if not done properly.
i also always go with a K&N or some better air flow set up, did you notice any better gas mileage? i'm real excited to see better throttle response and passing power. and thanks for install instructions.Me too. I did a whole write up on it in the parts/accessories section. Let us know what you think about it. Ive already noticed better throttle response and passing power on the freeway.
The gas mileage did improve a little, maybe 1mpg, but it's hard to tell because I always drove it hard and always stayed in sport mode which worked well with the added airflow and higher rpm shifts.i also always go with a K&N or some better air flow set up, did you notice any better gas mileage? i'm real excited to see better throttle response and passing power. and thanks for install instructions.
do you still have this set up installed? What filter is that?View attachment 788
So got some news guys and gals (granted this was an experimental version but...
1. It does work (ran about 50 miles after install)
2. Actually decently cheap (about 40-50$ for this experimental version)
3. The maf housing was for (get ready to laugh) a honda civic (M8B7 70 mm)
4.Yes it does give the tubo fluttler sounds
5.About the same fuel economy (i was heavier on the pedal because yanno turbo flutter and only seen a difference of about 0.1 mpg over 50 miles)
6. Yes that is the stock airvox base as you would either have to:
A. Have a hanger or bracket to hold the intake and housing up
Or
B. Just lay the intake inside of the airbox as i did which actually doesn't move around a whole lot if at all (i checked every so often about 5 times during the trip)
50 mile test range was city and open roads as well so it was a mix of both with no issues.
I'll keep everyone updated but for now this does work